<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blogging versus Micro-blogging</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourdonreport.com/index.php/2008/03/30/blogging-versus-micro-blogging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourdonreport.com/index.php/2008/03/30/blogging-versus-micro-blogging/</link>
	<description>Blogging the impact of computer-related technology trends, and whatever else catches my interest.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:22:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: jxqjxomy</title>
		<link>http://www.yourdonreport.com/index.php/2008/03/30/blogging-versus-micro-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-37011</link>
		<dc:creator>jxqjxomy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 14:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourdonreport.com/index.php/2008/03/30/blogging-versus-micro-blogging/#comment-37011</guid>
		<description>x5olid  &lt;a href=&quot;http://umlcatzmqiqb.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;umlcatzmqiqb&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>x5olid  <a href="http://umlcatzmqiqb.com/" rel="nofollow">umlcatzmqiqb</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ymarpkd</title>
		<link>http://www.yourdonreport.com/index.php/2008/03/30/blogging-versus-micro-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-36925</link>
		<dc:creator>ymarpkd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 19:51:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourdonreport.com/index.php/2008/03/30/blogging-versus-micro-blogging/#comment-36925</guid>
		<description>j5Z2ND  &lt;a href=&quot;http://ilfvlzhjunum.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;ilfvlzhjunum&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>j5Z2ND  <a href="http://ilfvlzhjunum.com/" rel="nofollow">ilfvlzhjunum</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deliverance</title>
		<link>http://www.yourdonreport.com/index.php/2008/03/30/blogging-versus-micro-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-36564</link>
		<dc:creator>Deliverance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Apr 2011 14:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourdonreport.com/index.php/2008/03/30/blogging-versus-micro-blogging/#comment-36564</guid>
		<description>PRper1 Ppl like you get all the brains. I just get to say thanks for he answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PRper1 Ppl like you get all the brains. I just get to say thanks for he answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Tremblay</title>
		<link>http://www.yourdonreport.com/index.php/2008/03/30/blogging-versus-micro-blogging/comment-page-1/#comment-28735</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Tremblay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 04:46:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.yourdonreport.com/index.php/2008/03/30/blogging-versus-micro-blogging/#comment-28735</guid>
		<description>Hey Ed -

I just splice a chunk or 3 of your post into my longish &lt;a href=&quot;http://mozdawg.blogspot.com/2008/03/message-beyond-blogs-conversation-has.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;Conversations in Motion&quot; at MozDawg&lt;/a&gt;. (The title is an allusion to cognitive ergonomics, &quot;information in action&quot;.)
While the post as a whole actually replies to a couple of other of this day&#039;s posts in other blogs, yours really got me grokking.

It relates to &lt;a href=&quot;http://twitter.com/bentrem/statuses/779919771&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;what I tweeted at you earlier&lt;/a&gt;: (expanded version) &quot;Years ago I had a uniquely handy writing tool, something like cross-breed of programmer&#039;s editor and wordprocessor; it stored snippets of text in buffers to be recalled and stitched together later. &quot;ThinkingCap&quot;, by Br&#246;derbund Software ... for the C=64!&quot;

NEPOMUK ... unless we&#039;re insane then our activities are inexorably bound together by ?what? something ... the fabric of time/space itself, to get trippy. But that&#039;s nothing more than mandala theory ... there are no problems here, IMNSHO except (as I grumpily stated in my blog) that we&#039;re too often tool-oriented instead of task-oriented.

ThoughtLiners. That ThinkingCap was one of a very small few (There was an even earlier analog, for the Apple IIE) shows how we&#039;ve lost that existential basis. Or, at least, our tool-smythes have.

This tool-smythe hasn&#039;t. (Which may explain why I&#039;m having to make due with a 300MHz machine!)

appreciating your sane voice in this mad mad world

--bentrem</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ed -</p>
<p>I just splice a chunk or 3 of your post into my longish <a href="http://mozdawg.blogspot.com/2008/03/message-beyond-blogs-conversation-has.html" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Conversations in Motion&#8221; at MozDawg</a>. (The title is an allusion to cognitive ergonomics, &#8220;information in action&#8221;.)<br />
While the post as a whole actually replies to a couple of other of this day&#8217;s posts in other blogs, yours really got me grokking.</p>
<p>It relates to <a href="http://twitter.com/bentrem/statuses/779919771" rel="nofollow">what I tweeted at you earlier</a>: (expanded version) &#8220;Years ago I had a uniquely handy writing tool, something like cross-breed of programmer&#8217;s editor and wordprocessor; it stored snippets of text in buffers to be recalled and stitched together later. &#8220;ThinkingCap&#8221;, by Br&ouml;derbund Software &#8230; for the C=64!&#8221;</p>
<p>NEPOMUK &#8230; unless we&#8217;re insane then our activities are inexorably bound together by ?what? something &#8230; the fabric of time/space itself, to get trippy. But that&#8217;s nothing more than mandala theory &#8230; there are no problems here, IMNSHO except (as I grumpily stated in my blog) that we&#8217;re too often tool-oriented instead of task-oriented.</p>
<p>ThoughtLiners. That ThinkingCap was one of a very small few (There was an even earlier analog, for the Apple IIE) shows how we&#8217;ve lost that existential basis. Or, at least, our tool-smythes have.</p>
<p>This tool-smythe hasn&#8217;t. (Which may explain why I&#8217;m having to make due with a 300MHz machine!)</p>
<p>appreciating your sane voice in this mad mad world</p>
<p>&#8211;bentrem</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

