Will Office 2008 popularize iWork, like Vista popularized Leopard?

Bookmark and Share

January 10th, 2008

I got an unexpected email message from Apple yesterday, informing me that Microsoft’s Office 2008 product was available for “pre-order”; it will be officially released at next week’s MacWorld, along with a slew of other hardware and software products.

Well, it’s been four years since we’ve seen a new version of Word, Excel, and Powerpoint for the Mac; and I’ve been increasingly annoyed by how often Word 2004 crashes on my Mac. So I went ahead and ordered it, and I now look forward, with mixed feelings, to its arrival next week. I was a little surprised to see that even an upgrade costs $299.95, and a full version of the software (i.e., for first-time customers) is $499.95. Admittedly, that’s for the high-end “special media” edition of the product; but it does make you wonder whether more and more people will be tempted by Apple’s own alternative, iWork (containing Pages, Numbers, and Keynote) for a mere $79.00.

I don’t even know what kind of features I should expect to see in Office 2008, so I surfed around the Internet and skimmed through some articles like “First Look: Word 2008” and “First Look:Excel 2008“. What surprised me most was not the glib, superficial review of features, functions, and overall “look-and-feel” of the new products, but rather the emotional, vituperative comments from dozens of readers that appeared at the end of each article. I realize that some of this — perhaps even most of this — comes from Apple fanatics who are opposed to just about anything that Microsoft does; but at the same time, many of the comments seemed valid. Cluttered user interface? Sluggish performance? Less compatibility between Windows and Mac platforms than ever before, because of the removal of VBA? With all these negatives, were are the positives?

It makes me wonder whether the overall market reaction to Office 2008 will be similar to the reaction to Windows Vista — not just a loud “yawn,” but a growing awareness that maybe we should look more closely at the Apple alternative. The comparison between Microsoft’s Vista and Apple’s new Leopard OS has to be at least part of the reason for the increased popularity of Mac computers; and I think the comparison between Word and Pages, or Powerpoint and Keynote, could do the same thing.

In my case, I ignored the first two versions of Apple’s Keynote presentation program when it first came out; there were too many limitations and problems. But the latest version is awesome (not perfect, just awesome), and I can’t imagine why anyone would choose to use Powerpoint in its place. And I’ve started taking another look at Apple’s latest Pages word-processor, and was surprised to see that “advanced” features like change-tracking (or “red-lining,” so you can see what changes have been made to an existing document) and creating a Table of Contents are now there. I know that Pages doesn’t have every feature that’s available in Word — for example, I don’t think it can create an index of all words found in a document, which is very handy if you happen to be writing a 500-page book — but it’s gone from having just 80-90% of Word’s features to something closer to 95-99%. And it imports/exports traditional Microsoft Word documents, so I can still exchange documents with my less fortunate Windows colleagues.

In the long run, of course, my personal opinions, likes, and dislikes won’t have any noticeable impact on the success of Office 2008. And since Office 2004 is even less stable under Apple’s Leopard operating system than ever before (Excel, for example, sometimes refuses to let me enter data into random spreadsheet cells), I guess my decision to spent $299.95 for an upgrade was reasonable. After all, if Microsoft only creates such upgrades every four years, that works out to about 20 cents a day.

But if it does take another four years for Microsoft to produce the next version of Office on the Mac, I wonder whether anyone will notice at all … in which case, I wonder whether Microsoft will even bother. If Office 2008 does indeed elicit a combination of yawns and outraged complaints, maybe we will finally shift over to Apple’s iWork.

It will be interesting to hear the early reactions to Office 2008 next week …

7 responses about “Will Office 2008 popularize iWork, like Vista popularized Leopard?”

  1. Jeffrey Walker said:

    Boy, didn’t that $300 upgrade piss me off too, and for what? A newer version of a word processor that routinely irks the crap out of me because it tries to out-think me in formatting? A while back, an economist/mathematician friend convinced me that one of MS’ best products is Excel. I am soooo into Keynote.

    5 minutes with Vista (with help from two MS employees at their Mountain View campus, mind you) to simply load a one page powerpoint doc from my flash drive was like sticking needles in my eyes.

    Switching gears: speaking to someone who knows what one of the biggest Henges in the world is! (No one’s built a henge like that ever since. No one knows WTF a henge is.), I found full transcripts of Eddie Izzard’s masterful work here this morning…

    http://www.auntiemomo.com/cakeordeath/d2ktranscription.html

    A genius. — Jeffrey http://www.radiowalker.com

  2. Dwayne Phillips said:

    I received an email from Apple this morning about the coming Office 2008. I have a copy of the student version of Office 2004 on an old iBook. I never figured out what was lacking in the student version. I don’t know what is lacking in the student version of 2008, but it is a lot less costly.

    I’m using NeoOffice (neooffice.org), a spin off of OpenOffice for OS X. It seems to work well.

    I have noticed more people using iWork 2008 and Pages.

  3. Mr. Elvin said:

    I thought about purchasing the $500 Apple that runs on Intel. Is it worth it? My question is whether it is too limited, or does it really give a workable Apple environment.
    Regards!

  4. Price Taylor said:

    Mr. Elvin, are you referring to the Mac Mini? I don’t know anyone that has one. Our CEO/Chairman/another board member all have MacBook Pros.

  5. Price Taylor said:

    Ed, I saw Keynote used at the 2007 Society for Information Management’s conference in Memphis. It was the CIO of FedEx, Rob Carter. I was impressed. It appeared to me that presenters using Macs were about 40%.

  6. Alex Chan said:

    I think you’re probably right. I have a copy of iWork ‘08 and Office 2008 (which I got yesterday), both running in Leopard. I was expected Office to be pants, but I have to say I was pleasantly surprised. Unfortunately though, I felt that too many of the new features were copied from iWork – e.g. picture frames in Word. So, I’m now using an iWork and Office Combo. I use: Pages, Keynote and Excel, with Word and PowerPoint being used for compatibility issues.

  7. Price Taylor said:

    Alex, I think Excel is the “keeper” of the bunch since it’s (a) very powerful and (b) very familiar to a lot of people.

    I’m demoing the Office 2007 suite at work and am still finding the “ribbon” both more clumsy and somehpw better than it’s predecessors.

Leave a Reply