<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ghost data</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.yourdonreport.com/index.php/2006/11/10/ghost-data/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.yourdonreport.com/index.php/2006/11/10/ghost-data/</link>
	<description>Blogging the impact of computer-related technology trends, and whatever else catches my interest.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 04 Jan 2012 20:22:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Hank Heath</title>
		<link>http://www.yourdonreport.com/index.php/2006/11/10/ghost-data/comment-page-1/#comment-2535</link>
		<dc:creator>Hank Heath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 01:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yourdon.com/personal/blog/2006/11/10/ghost-data/#comment-2535</guid>
		<description>Ed: 

You are correct that the data is not being scrubbed - at least not since Y2K. The emphasis is not on the quality of the data, but the quantity available for data mining.

I know you will reasonably respond that the value of the data mining is only worth the quality of the data stored. However, as our frind over at 
The Long Tail will attest, the sheer volume of data has driven its value to zero. Why spend resources cleaning up free data?

- Hank Heath</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed: </p>
<p>You are correct that the data is not being scrubbed &#8211; at least not since Y2K. The emphasis is not on the quality of the data, but the quantity available for data mining.</p>
<p>I know you will reasonably respond that the value of the data mining is only worth the quality of the data stored. However, as our frind over at<br />
The Long Tail will attest, the sheer volume of data has driven its value to zero. Why spend resources cleaning up free data?</p>
<p>- Hank Heath</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Eddy</title>
		<link>http://www.yourdonreport.com/index.php/2006/11/10/ghost-data/comment-page-1/#comment-2465</link>
		<dc:creator>David Eddy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Nov 2006 17:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://yourdon.com/personal/blog/2006/11/10/ghost-data/#comment-2465</guid>
		<description>Ed -

Taken a look at your credit reports recently?  

One of mine is nice enough to list my places of employment... the most recent/current being a employer I left in 1979 (indicating that I have not been employed since 1979... ducky!).

Let&#039;s see... how do we spell D-A-T-A  Q-U-A-L-I-T-Y?


An excellent read on the very ugly reality is Robert O&#039;Harrow&#039;s &quot;No Place to Hide&quot; 

- David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ed -</p>
<p>Taken a look at your credit reports recently?  </p>
<p>One of mine is nice enough to list my places of employment&#8230; the most recent/current being a employer I left in 1979 (indicating that I have not been employed since 1979&#8230; ducky!).</p>
<p>Let&#8217;s see&#8230; how do we spell D-A-T-A  Q-U-A-L-I-T-Y?</p>
<p>An excellent read on the very ugly reality is Robert O&#8217;Harrow&#8217;s &#8220;No Place to Hide&#8221; </p>
<p>- David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

